Jump to content

Talk:Kilcoy, Queensland/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Reference

Having a problem with duplication of references - I can't see how to modify them so that there is only one reference showing for multiple entries using the same source. If anyone can assist, I would be most grateful. Thanks. Somersetpedia.paul (talk) 06:53, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

wiki pic gold mining kilcoy creek c1933

File:StateLibQld 1 112124 Gold mining at Kilcoy Creek, 1933.jpg description 1 Gold mining at Kilcoy ... Queensland's Sunshine Coast hinterland. The town is north-west of Caboolture on the D’Aguilar Highway ... (1,000 × 749 (104 KB)) - 18:41, 29 May 2013 --Andys'edtits 14:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andys'edtits (talk • contribs)

several massacres

One massacre of indigenous people is well-known and documented here with citations but there is the casual comment about it being one of several massacres. Does anyone have information about any others? Kerry (talk) 02:39, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kilcoy, Queensland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:23, 9 April 2019 (UTC)

Anglican church in Kilcoy - subject of many problematic contributions over the years - be alert!

Today, I see there are new edits critising the Anglican Church in Kilcoy. There is a long history of similar problematic single edits and groups of edits from a number of IP accounts and a named account all in relation to the Anglican church in Kilcoy, criticising it in much the same way. The problems from a Wikipedia policy perspective are numerous: misleading edit summaries, adding uncited content or citing personal websites, or adding insufficient citations to undertake verification, or providing citations that fail verification, probable WP:BLP violations (people mentioned by name or being easy to identify from their description in a small town), removing cited content, or the citation for cited content, or replaced cited content with other content (not supported by the existing citation), and sometimes bracketing these problematic edits with other unrelated but harmless edits to disguise the real edit sometimes done by another account, etc e.g.

I and other users have deleted these edits over several years, yet they keep turning up again. It is well beyond Assume Good Faith. I note an account that was also active around some of these edits but doing harmless edits was User:Archangelbris which has subsequently been declared the sockpuppet master of Ulrich von Metz.

In the same timeframes of July-August 2018, the article Anglican Diocese of Brisbane received similar treatment, same techniques, same themes, and the same two named users (now known to be socks) were active at that time in addition to a number of IP users, and even includes criticism of the Kilcoy church, just to help connect the two attacks e.g. [14] and there may be other instances of similar attacks in other articles that I have not encountered. There have been more recent attacks of a similar nature on thae diocese article.

Obviously everybody is entitled to their opinions on Anglican beliefs/practices (not being Anglican, I don't really care), but it is not acceptable to use Wikipedia in this way. It violates our major policies involving No original research, Use reliable sources, Neutral point of view, biographies of living people, as well as our processes. Please be alert to further instances of this kind of activity. Thanks Kerry (talk) 06:14, 7 February 2024 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Kilcoy,_Queensland/Archive_1&oldid=1238386203"